- Toolkits
- Are You Ready to Talk?
- Beyond the Line
- Blocking Gender Bias
- Edgy Veggies
- First-Gen Ascend
- Fishbowl Discussions
- Measuring Mobility
- Peaceful Politics
- Plot the Me You Want to Be
- RaceWorks
- Rethinking Stress
- Space Reface
- Team Up Against Prejudice
- United States of Immigrants
- Kit Companion: Map Your Identities
- Kit Companion: LARA
- Collections
- Action Areas
- About
blockinggenderbias-research
Relevant Research
Original Study
Miyake, A., Kost-Smith, L. E., Finkelstein, N. D., Pollock, S. J., Cohen, G. L., & Ito, T. A. (2010). Reducing the gender achievement gap in college science: A classroom study of values affirmation. Science, 330(6008), 1234-1237.
Summary
To test whether a so-called values-affirmation task would improve women’s grades in STEM, psychologist Akira Miyake and colleagues assigned 399 students in a college physics class to one of two groups. Students in the values-affirmation group spent 15 minutes in the first week of class writing about their most important values, while students in the control group wrote about their least important values. Before the midterm exam, students once again wrote about either their most or least treasured values. Students remained in the same condition for both assignments.
All students also completed a survey measuring how much they believed the stereotype that men are better than women in science and math.
At the end of the course, the researchers found that women in the values-affirmation group earned higher test scores than did women in the control group. Indeed, women who wrote about their core values scored nearly on par with the men in the class. In addition, the intervention worked better for women who more strongly endorsed the stereotype that men are better than women.
Why This Works
When people express their values, their sense of self-worth improves, which helps reduce stress, improve performance, and protect them from negative stereotypes about their group.
When This Works Best
This intervention works best for women who believe the stereotype that men are better than women in STEM.
Change Model
1. ACTIVITIES→
-
Students:
- Reflect on important values in the writing exercise
2. PSYCHOLOGICAL CHANGES→
-
Women students:
- Feel better about themselves
- Cope better with the stereotype that women are bad at science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM)
3. BEHAVIORAL CHANGES→
-
Women:
- Perform better on STEM tests
- Earn higher grades in STEM courses
4. SOCIETAL CHANGES
- Women earn more STEM degrees
- Women enter more STEM careers
- The stereotype that women are bad at STEM weakens
Additional Research
Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Apfel, N., & Master, A. (2006). Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social-psychological intervention. Science, 313(5791), 1307-1310.
Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Apfel, N., & Brzustoski, P. (2009). Recursive processes in self-affirmation: Intervening to close the minority achievement gap. Science, 324(5925), 400-403.
Shnabel, N., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Cook, J. E., Garcia, J., & Cohen, G. L. (2013). Demystifying values-affirmation interventions: Writing about social belonging is a key to buffering against identity threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(5), 663-676.
In the Media
Discover: 15-minute writing exercise closes the gender gap in university-level physics